Since the mid 1950s, Australia has been part of the secretive UKUSA signals intelligence agreements, now known as “Five Eyes”.
According to US intelligence analyst Jeffrey Richelson, the CIA and FBI supplied Israel with top secret intelligence. This arrangement remained secret until it was no longer tenable and required formalising, and the “Israel — US 1999 Agreement” was signed.
Tanter said “signals intelligence was at the heart of the new suite of institutions and procedures”.
A Memorandum of Understanding, signed in 2009 between the NSACSS and the Israeli Sigint National Unit, formalised protection for US citizens caught up in raw US signals intelligence.
This, Tanter said, indicates the extent to which Israel had been given privileged access to raw data from the NSA.
While acknowledging the difficulties to convey in summary form the “intimate intelligence relationship between the two countries”, Tanter said “the salience to the issue of possible complicity with activities discussed by the ICJ Order of 26 January is clear” and he provides that evidence (page 17).
“All US signals intelligence facilities that can possibly be brought to bear will have elevated tasking schedules focusing on Gaza.”
Whether Australia is complicit in genocide could be validated, or not, by Australia placing restrictions on Pine Gap-derived Gaza-related intelligence sharing with the NSA until the ICJ makes a judgment. The US could do the same, Tanter said.
But neither government has announced “such a precautionary approach, following the ICJ Order”.
Tanter said domestic and international law requires Australia to “investigate in good faith” its possible complicity in genocide through its provision of intelligence to Israel.
Having signed 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide, Australia has an obligation to “prevent and punish” plausible or demonstrated cases of genocide.
Attorney General Mark Dreyfus must investigate and report to both Cabinet and the parliament.
“A review by the IGIS should ensure that nothing Australia has done or is doing in any way amounts to complicity in the activities set out by the ICJ order.”
The government’s position not to comment on the Pine Gap activities is selective, Tanter said.
Defence minister Robert Ray in November 1991 told parliament about the role the joint defence facility, Nurrungar, played in the Gulf War as part of Desert Storm.
Tanter pointed out that at least “the functions of a major joint facility in a time of international conflict and the policies of the Australian government … could be publicly addressed”.
Today, he and others want the IGIS to answer the following: “Does anything the ASD has done or is doing amounts to complicity in the activities set out by the Order from the International Court of Justice?
“Does Pine Gap-derived intelligence forwarded to the National Security Agency do so? In such a case, does the government concur with such a policy?
“And, if the government does concur in such a policy, is not a veto, at least while until final judgment by the International Court of Justice, not the appropriate response?
“If not for a plausible and urgent claim of genocide, subject to a case before the world’s highest court that raises the possibility of Australian complicity, then for what would Australia ever exercise its sovereign right to veto what happens on Australian soil?” |